1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 871 F.Supp.
  5. 871 F.Supp. 299 (1994)
 

TLUSTY v. U.S.

No. 93-X-75332-DT.

871 F.Supp. 299 (1994)

Thomas E. TLUSTY and Mary S. Tlusty, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

May 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. and Mary S. Tlusty, in pro per.

Mary S. Rigdon, Asst. U.S. Atty., Detroit, MI, Keith V. Morgan, Trial Atty., Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for defendant USA.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

HACKETT, District Judge.

Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss petitioners' pro se petition to quash the third-party summons issued by respondent to Comerica Bank. After failing to respond to defendant's motion, petitioner responded to this court's order to show cause why respondent's motion should not be granted. For the reasons stated in this order, respondent's motion shall be granted.

According to the government...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases