Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in denying her cross motion for an award of counsel fees. Because of the significant disparity in the incomes of the parties, we conclude that the court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff's cross motion (see, Ahern v Ahern,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.