The trial of this medical malpractice action was adjourned on three occasions in 1990 due to plaintiffs' inability to procure an expert witness. On the third occasion, Supreme Court marked the case off the calendar. One year later, plaintiffs moved to restore it. Supreme Court denied the motion and, on reconsideration, adhered to its original decision. This appeal ensued.
We affirm. To prevail on a CPLR 3404 motion, the movant must demonstrate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
