Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
There is no merit to the contentions of respondent that Family Court failed to consider adequately his individual needs or that the court's direction that respondent be placed in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth is not the least restrictive alternative commensurate with respondent's needs and the need to protect the community (see, Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2]; § 353.3...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.