1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 849 F.Supp.
  5. 849 F.Supp. 298 (1994)
 

PRIVILEGE YACHTING, INC. v. TEED

Civ. A. No. 93-241-JJF.

849 F.Supp. 298 (1994)

PRIVILEGE YACHTING, INC., Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant, v. John TEED and S/Y Forty Roses I, Defendants and Counter-Claimants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

April 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael B. McCauley, of Palmer Biezup & Henderson, Wilmington, DE, John G. Kissane, of Palmer Biezup & Henderson, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.

Peter E. Hess, Wilmington, DE, for defendants.

OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Presently before the Court is the Motion to Quash Admiralty Arrest of the Forty Roses filed by Defendant John Teed (D.I. 43). Because the Court finds that there is no basis for admiralty jurisdiction or the arrest of the vessel in rem, the Court will grant Defendant's Motion to Quash.

II. FACTS

The following facts are undisputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases