ROE v. ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. PAUL

No. C5-93-2519.

518 N.W.2d 629 (1994)

Mary ROE, et al., Appellants, v. ARCHDIOCESE OF ST. PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS, et al., Gerald (Jerry) Piche, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied August 24, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Weyland, Wayzata, for appellant.

Thomas B. Wieser, St. Paul, for Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, et al.

Theodore J. Collins, Thomas E. McEllistrem, St. Paul, for Gerald (Jerry) Piche.

Considered and decided by KALITOWSKI, P.J., and RANDALL and AMUNDSON, JJ.


OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellants seek review of the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents, contending the district court erred in concluding that their claims against respondents are barred by the statute of limitations.

FACTS

In February 1982, appellant, identified in the district court as Mary Roe (Roe), began counseling sessions with her parish priest, respondent Gerald Piche, at respondent The Church...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases