1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 886 P.2d
  5. 886 P.2d 259 (1994)
 

ROEMER OIL CO. v. AZTEC GAS & OIL CORP.

No. 93-266.

886 P.2d 259 (1994)

ROEMER OIL COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. AZTEC GAS & OIL CORPORATION a Nevada corporation, Appellee (Defendant).

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

December 1, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph E. Hallock of Stevens, Edwards & Hallock, P.C., Gillette, Michael Rosenthal of Hathaway, Speight, Kunz & Trautwein, Cheyenne, as local counsel; and Timothy R. Beyer and Stephen D. Gurr of Baker & Hostetler, Denver, CO, for appellant.

Jon B. Huss of Brown & Drew, Casper, for appellee.

Before GOLDEN, C.J., and THOMAS, MACY, and TAYLOR, JJ., and McEWAN, District Judge Ret.

TAYLOR, Justice.

The primary question in this appeal is whether the term "reworking" in an oil and gas operating agreement is ambiguous in meaning. The district court determined that the term was not ambiguous and that, under the terms of the agreement, appellee was entitled to summary judgment.

We reverse.

I. ISSUES

Appellant, Roemer Oil Company (Roemer), raises these issues:

1. Whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases