1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 39 F.3d
  5. 39 F.3d 1105 (1994)
 

MORRIS v. CITY OF HOBART

Nos. 93-6150, 93-6184.

39 F.3d 1105 (1994)

Louie MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. CITY OF HOBART, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

November 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eric S. Eissenstat (Greg A. Castro, of Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, with him on the briefs), of Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, Oklahoma City, OK, for defendant-appellant-cross-appellee.

Mark Hammons, of Hammons & Associates, Inc., Oklahoma City, OK, for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.

Before TACHA and KELLY, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL, District Judge.

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

I. Background

In 1986 plaintiff Louie Morris filed suit in federal court against the City of Hobart, alleging that the City had discriminated against him on the basis of race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereinafter the "Title VII lawsuit"). In July 1987, the parties reached a settlement. The trial judge was advised of the settlement and entered an Administrative Closing Order in the court docket.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases