STATE v. TESSEMA

No. C5-94-67.

515 N.W.2d 626 (1994)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Tesfay TESSEMA, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 3, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Michael J. Mayer, Grannis, Grannis, Hauge, Eide, Anderson & Keller, Eagan, for respondent.

Fred A. Reiter, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered at Special Term and decided by ANDERSON, C.J., and PARKER and HUSPENI, JJ.


SPECIAL TERM OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Judge.

The state moves to dismiss this appeal from a petty misdemeanor conviction as being untimely filed. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

FACTS

Appellant Tesfay Tessema was charged with a controlled access violation. The controlled access offense became a misdemeanor because Tessema had two prior convictions for moving traffic offenses within the last seven months. But the prosecutor and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases