ZENNS v. HARTFORD ACC. AND INDEM. CO.

No. 9326SC832.

444 S.E.2d 692 (1994)

115 N.C. App. 482

Gerald ZENNS and Walton Jones Quinby, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and Sentry Insurance, a Mutual Company, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

July 5, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Douglas Moretz, P.A. by J. Douglas Moretz, Sanford, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein by Josephine H. Hicks, Charlotte, for defendant-appellee Sentry Ins., a Mut. Co.


EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment for defendant Sentry because plaintiff Quinby's policy with defendant Sentry remained in effect at the time the accident occurred. We disagree.

G.S. 20-310 (1989) provides:

(f) No cancellation or refusal to renew by an insurer of a policy of automobile insurance shall be effective unless the insurer shall have given the policyholder notice at his last known...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases