1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 24 Cal.App.4th
  5. 24 Cal.App.4th 88 (1994)
 

COE v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. B067492.

24 Cal.App.4th 88 (1994)

29 Cal. Rptr.2d 297

RITA COE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

April 14, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Sparagna, Sparagna & Breslau and Francis A. Sparagna for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

James K. Hahn, City Attorney, Thomas C. Hokinson, Assistant City Attorney, and Renee J. Laurents, Deputy City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

HASTINGS, J.

Appellants seek reversal of an order dismissing their complaint based upon violation of the five-year statute within which a matter must be brought to trial. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.310.)1 They also contend that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to grant two ex parte applications to reset trial prior to the running...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases