Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
The testimony of a police officer that respondent was in recent possession of stolen property, together with other testimony of the officer that supported an inference that respondent knew that the property was not his, is sufficient to corroborate accomplice testimony that respondent engaged in conduct constituting the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree (see,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.