McCUBBREY v. VENINGA

No. 93-15579.

39 F.3d 1054 (1994)

J. Bruce McCUBBREY, Donald L. Bartels, Virginia H. Meyer, Calvin B. Ward, and McCubbrey, Bartels, Meyer & Ward, a California partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dolores M. VENINGA, George Hook and McBride, Baker & Coles, an Illinois partnership, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided November 9, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick A. Cone, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jesse F. Ruiz, Robinson and Wood, San Jose, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: CHOY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, District Judge.


MARQUEZ, District Judge:

J. Bruce McCubbrey, Donald L. Bartels, Virginia H. Meyer, Calvin B. Ward, and the law firm of McCubbrey, Bartels, Meyer & Ward (collectively "McCubbrey") appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in McCubbrey's malicious prosecution action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, see Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp. 872 F.2d 1416<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases