1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 24 Cal.App.4th
  5. 24 Cal.App.4th 1067 (1994)
 

SHADOW TRAFFIC NETWORK v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. B079011.

24 Cal.App.4th 1067 (1994)

29 Cal. Rptr.2d 693

SHADOW TRAFFIC NETWORK et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; METRO TRAFFIC CONTROL, INC., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

May 2, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Latham & Watkins, Alan I. Rothenberg, William C. Bottger, Jr., and Diane L. Turner for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Andrews & Kurth, James B. Hicks and Kathy A. Jorrie for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

VOGEL (C.S.), J. —

INTRODUCTION

Metro Traffic Control, Inc. (Metro), and Shadow Traffic Network (Shadow) are competitors in the traffic reporting business. Each contracts with radio stations to gather and broadcast information about traffic conditions. In December 1991, Metro sued Shadow, alleging that Shadow was engaging in various business torts.1

Each was represented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases