1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 633 So.2d
  5. 633 So.2d 454 (1994)
 

BELL v. VANLANDINGHAM

1930063.

633 So.2d 454 (1994)

Hollis Ray BELL and Helen Bell v. John A. VANLANDINGHAM, M.D.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

February 25, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

D. Leon Ashford, Michael D. Ermert and Bruce J. McKee of Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton, Birmingham, for appellants.

A. Danner Frazer, Jr. and Edward C. Greene of Frazer, Greene, Philpot & Upchurch, Mobile, and Edward T. Hines of Thompson, Garrett & Hines, Brewton, for appellee.

INGRAM, Justice.

Hollis Ray Bell and his wife Helen Bell brought a medical malpractice action against Dr. John A. Vanlandingham. The jury returned a verdict for Dr. Vanlandingham. The Bells moved for a new trial on the ground that the trial judge had erred by declining the Bells' request to strike three jurors for cause. The court overruled their motion for new trial, and the Bells appealed.

The dispositive issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases