CASE v. CASE

No. C1-93-2288.

516 N.W.2d 570 (1994)

Patricia M. CASE, Petitioner, Appellant, v. Roger J. CASE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 24, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael L. Perlman, Perlman Law Office, St. Louis Park, for appellant.

Robert A. Fleagle, Minnetonka, for respondent.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and HUSPENI and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Appellant contends the district court abused its discretion when it did not require respondent, under the parties' dissolution decree, to pay one-half of the private investigator's fees spent to locate their runaway daughter. The definition of "medical expenses" is not so broad so as to extend to these expenses. We affirm.

FACTS

Upon dissolution, respondent Roger Case received custody of the parties' eldest daughter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases