1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 863 F.Supp.
  5. 863 F.Supp. 217 (1994)
 

U.S. v. PENNSYLVANIA

Civ. A. No. 93-2094.

863 F.Supp. 217 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, et al. v. PENNSYLVANIA, et al. Harry NELSON, et al. v. Karen F. SNIDER, et al.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

August 13, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pamela Chen, Mark Masling, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, Edmond Tiryak, Philadelphia, PA, Judith Gran, Public Interest Law Center of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiffs.

Thomas York, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, Harrisburg, PA, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

NEWCOMER, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is the Motion in Limine of plaintiff United States of America, and the response of defendants thereto. For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted.

I. Background

These consolidated actions were brought by the United States of America (and, as intervenor, People Interested in Embreeville Residents, a group comprised mainly of relatives of residents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases