U.S. v. PINSON

No. 93-2851.

24 F.3d 1056 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Joseph PINSON, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided May 23, 1994.

Rehearing Denied June 21, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray Stone, St. Louis, MO, argued, for appellant.

Kenneth R. Tihen, St. Louis, MO, argued (Edward L. Dowd, Jr., Kenneth R. Tihen and Frans Von Kaenel, on the brief), for appellee.

Before BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, and BRIGHT and ROSS, Senior Circuit Judges.


ROSS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Appellant Joseph Pinson appeals from the jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of manufacturing over 100 marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). On appeal, Pinson claims the government's aerial surveillance of his residence with an electronic device known as a Forward Looking Infrared Device (FLIR) constituted an illegal search in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. Pinson also challenges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases