WINDHAM v. ALEXANDER, WESTON & POEHNER

No. 06-94-00053-CV.

887 S.W.2d 182 (1994)

Sue Ann WINDHAM, Appellant, v. ALEXANDER, WESTON & POEHNER, P.C., FKA Alexander & Weston, P.C., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.

Rehearing Overruled November 15, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Huckabee, Francis & Huckabee, Dallas, for appellant.

Ken R. Davey, Dallas, for appellee.

Before CORNELIUS, C.J., and BLEIL and GRANT, JJ.


OPINION

GRANT, Justice.

Sue Ann Windham appeals from a summary judgment on a promissory note, contending that fact issues existed on her defensive issues of duress and failure of consideration.

Windham retained the law firm of Alexander, Weston & Poehner, P.C., to represent her in her divorce. After a two-week trial, the jury found that Windham should pay her own attorneys' fees in the amount of $43,000. Under the divorce decree (which was rendered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases