GANTON TECHNOLOGIES v. NAT. INDUS. GROUP PENSION

No. 93 Civ. 3047 (LLS).

865 F.Supp. 201 (1994)

GANTON TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and Shirley Klamm, Ronald Brown, and Craig Small, as employees of Ganton Technologies, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL GROUP PENSION PLAN, a Multi-employer Trust Fund, Stanley L. Eisner, Ronald W. Borst, Michael Kelly, A.E. Samson, Richard Shirley, Milford E. Woodbeck, Elmer Chatak, Dominick D'Ambrosio, Edgar Ball, Odessa Komer, and Harvey Martin, as Trustees of the National Industrial Group Pension Plan, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

October 19, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wildman, Harrold, Allen, Dixon & Smith, New York City (H. Roderic Heard, Matthew A. Hurd, Kimberly E. Roy, Thomas J. Smith, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Epstein Becker & Green, P.C., New York City (Philip M. Berkowitz, Linda E. Rosenzweig, Erica L. Summers, of counsel), for defendants.


Opinion and Order

STANTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Ganton Technologies, Inc. ("Ganton") and three Ganton employees brought this action claiming that defendants National Industrial Group Pension Plan ("NIGPP"), a multiemployer defined-benefit pension plan, and its trustees violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, and section 302(c)(5) of the Labor Management Relations Act ("LMRA"), 29 U.S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases