U.S. v. SCARBOROUGH

No. 93-2502.

43 F.3d 1021 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott SCARBOROUGH, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided October 25, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Debold (argued), John R. Roth, Asst. U.S. Atty. (briefed), Terrence G. Berg, Office of the U.S. Atty., Detroit, MI, for plaintiff-appellee.

Ralph Musilli (argued and briefed), Musilli & Baumgardner, St. Clair Shores, MI, for defendant-appellant.

Before: KEITH, KENNEDY, and SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judges.


KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction on one count of conspiracy to obstruct justice and several counts of making false statements before a grand jury. Defendant first argues that the District Court erred in admitting taped conversations with co-conspirators and allowing the jury to use transcripts of these conversations. Specifically, defendant argues that the tapes were unintelligible, that the entire tapes should have been admitted rather than...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases