Defendant urges on this appeal that the photo identification procedures used to identify him were unduly suggestive. The basis for his claim is the allegation that the undercover officer who identified him was told prior to viewing a selection of photos in a police mugbook that it was defendant's voice on tape in a previous sale of cocaine in which the undercover officer had not been able to positively identify defendant. County Court, however, specifically found that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
