1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 229 Conn.
  5. 229 Conn. 829 (1994)
 

GAJEWSKI v. PAVELO

(14843)

229 Conn. 829 (1994)

MARIA GAJEWSKI ET AL. v. ARTHUR PAVELO ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released June 28, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosalind J. Koskoff with whom were Michael P. Koskoff and, on the brief, Richard A. Fuchs, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Barbara Brazzel-Massaro, associate city attorney, for the appellees (defendant city of Bridgeport et al.).

James E. Coyne, with whom, on the brief was Colleen D. Fries, for the appellee (defendant Utica Radiator Corporation).

CALLAHAN, BORDEN, BERDON, KATZ and PALMER, JS.

BORDEN, J.

The dispositive issue of this appeal is the applicability of the general verdict rule. The jury's handwritten verdict stated that the plaintiffs' claims were "inconclusive," but did not specifically mention the defendants' special defense. On the basis of this verdict, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs appealed to the Appellate Court, which applied the general verdict rule and affirmed the judgment of the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases