IN RE CONDUCT OF SCHENCK

JFC 91-119; SC S40197.

870 P.2d 185 (1994)

318 Or. 402

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF The Honorable Ronald D. SCHENCK, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided March 10, 1994.

Reconsideration Denied April 28, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald D. Schenck, La Grande, in pro per, argued the cause and filed the briefs.

Ronald L. Marceau, Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief on behalf of the Com'n on Judicial Fitness and Disability.

Thomas M. Christ, Portland, filed a brief amicus curiae on behalf of the ACLU Foundation of Oregon, Inc.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., VAN HOOMISSEN and UNIS, JJ., and RICHARDSON and WARREN, JJ. Pro Tem.


PER CURIAM.

This judicial discipline case is before the court on mandatory direct and de novo review of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Recommendation of the Commission on Judicial Fitness and Disability (Commission).1 The Commission issued a complaint and notice of institution of formal proceedings against Ronald D. Schenck, a judge of the circuit court of the State of Oregon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases