LORAL FAIRCHILD CORP. v. MATSUSHITA ELEC. INDUS.

Nos. 91 CV 5056 (SJ), 92 CV 0128 (SJ).

840 F.Supp. 211 (1994)

LORAL FAIRCHILD CORP., Plaintiff, v. MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL COMPANY, LTD., et al., Defendants. LORAL FAIRCHILD CORP., Plaintiff, v. VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN, LTD., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

January 7, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Wallace, Wiley, Rein & Fielding, Washington, DC, Edward M. Spiro, Kostelantz, Ritholz, Tigue & Fink, New York City, for plaintiff Loral Fairchild.

Joseph M. Fitzpatrick, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, New York City, for defendant Canon U.S.A.

Francis J. Hone, Brumbaugh, Graves, Donahue & Raymond, New York City, for defendant Fuji.

William A. Streff, Jr., Kirkland & Ellis, Chicago, IL, Lawrence J. Gotts, Kirkland & Ellis, Washington, DC, for defendant Hitachi.

Douglas B. Henderson, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, DC, for defendants Goldstar and Nikon.

Morton Amster, Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein, New York City, for Matsushita.

Francis E. Morris, Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, for defendant Mitsubishi.

Richard Codding, Spensley, Horn, Jubas & Lubitz, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant Murata.

Vernon M. Winters, Cooley Goodward Castro Huddleson & Tatum, San Francisco, CA, for defendants National Semiconductor Corp. and Fairchild Semiconductor Corp.

John M. Calimafde, Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil, Blaustein & Jodlowe, New York City, for defendant NEC.

Matthew D. Powers, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Menlo Park, CA, for defendant Oki.

Karen L. Hagberg, Morrison & Foerster, New York City, for defendant Ricoh.

Jack L. Lahr, Foley & Lardner, Washington, DC, for defendant Samsung.

John B. Pegram, Davis, Hoxie, Faithfull & Hapgood, New York City, for defendant Sanyo.

Barry W. Graham, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, DC, for defendant Sony.

Arthur I. Neustadt, Oblon, Fisher, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., Arlington, VA, for defendant Toshiba.


ORDER

JOHNSON, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Loral Fairchild Corporation ("Loral") brought this patent infringement suit on September 12, 1991 (91 CV 5056) and on June 22, 1992 brought additional claims against another ten defendants (92 CV 0128). In March 1993 Loral sought to amend the complaint to include claims concerning patent ownership against National Semiconductor Corporation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases