1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 852 F.Supp.
  5. 852 F.Supp. 196 (1994)
 

JIM BEAM BRANDS v. BEAMISH & CRAWFORD

No. 89 Civ. 5835 (RO).

852 F.Supp. 196 (1994)

JIM BEAM BRANDS CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. BEAMISH & CRAWFORD, LTD., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 4, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mercer L. Stockell, William G. Pecau, Jonathon E. Moskin, Pennie & Edmonds, New York City, for plaintiff.

Martin P. Endres, Hedman, Gibson, Costigan & Hoare, P.C., New York City, for defendant.

OPINION AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

This action is before me on remand from the Second Circuit, Jim Beam Brands Co. v. Beamish & Crawford Ltd., 937 F.2d 729 (2nd Cir.1991) familiarity with which is presumed. Plaintiff Jim Beam Brands Co., alleging trademark infringement and false designation of origin in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. (1988) as well as

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases