We affirm defendant's judgment of conviction for the following reasons: having withdrawn his motion to suppress physical evidence and having failed to renew the motion in accordance with CPL 710.60 (1), defendant waived his right to the suppression of the physical evidence seized during the search of his home (see, People v Bertolo,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. RODRICK
205 A.D.2d 841 (1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 445
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Emanuel Rodrick, Jr., Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 9, 1994
June 9, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.