Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Defendant contends that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish his constructive possession of the contraband seized from an apartment upon the execution of a search warrant. We disagree. We conclude that the evidence adduced at trial satisfies the requisite standard of proof in this wholly circumstantial evidence case (see, People v Torres,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.