KNUTSON v. YAMHILL COUNTY

CV92-139; CA A80448.

881 P.2d 156 (1994)

130 Or. App. 173

Claudia KNUTSON, Appellant, v. YAMHILL COUNTY, Yamhill County Department of Public Works, Lloyd Zentner and John Does I-XX, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 7, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Greg Noble argued the cause and filed the briefs, for appellant. With him on the opening brief was Olson & Rowell.

Janet M. Schroer argued the cause, for respondent Lloyd Zentner. With her on the brief was Hoffman, Hart & Wagner and Lisa Lear and Bullivant, Houser, Bailey, Pendergrass & Hoffman for respondents Yamhill County and Yamhill County Dept. of Public Works.

No appearance for respondents John Does I-XX.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.


LEESON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment dismissing various claims arising from her employment with defendant Yamhill County. We view the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, Seeborg v. General Motors Corp., 284 Or. 695, 699, 588 P.2d 1100 (1978), and affirm.

Between May, 1988, and March, 1991, plaintiff worked for the Yamhill County Department of Public Works...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases