1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 22 F.3d
  5. 22 F.3d 1010 (1994)
 

BOWLES FINANCIAL GROUP v. STIFEL, NICOLAUS & CO.

No. 93-6113.

22 F.3d 1010 (1994)

BOWLES FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 26, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Larry D. Bishop (Jerry D. Sokolosky with him on the briefs), Oklahoma City, OK, for plaintiff-appellee.

Dino E. Viera (Burck Bailey with him on the briefs) of Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, Oklahoma City, OK, for defendant-appellant.

Before BALDOCK, BARRETT and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

The sole issue presented is whether an arbitration award should be vacated when the attorney for the prevailing party deliberately, intentionally, affirmatively and repeatedly communicated to the arbitrators an offer of settlement from the non-prevailing party in an effort to influence the arbitrators' decision. Jurisdiction is found in 28 U.S.C.A. § 1291 and 9 U.S.C.A. § 16(a)(1)(D). We hold, in the absence of any evidence indicating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases