McLENAGAN v. KARNES

Nos. 93-1992, 93-1993.

27 F.3d 1002 (1994)

William R. McLENAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John C. KARNES, Richmond Police Officer, Defendant-Appellant, and Marty M. Tapscott, Chief of Police, City of Richmond; Thomas E. Shook, Captain, Police Department, City of Richmond; Andrew J. Winston, Sheriff of the City of Richmond; Loretta Smith, Richmond Deputy Sheriff, Defendants. William R. McLENAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrew J. WINSTON, Sheriff of the City of Richmond; Loretta Smith, Richmond Deputy Sheriff, Defendants-Appellants, and Marty M. Tapscott, Chief of Police, City of Richmond; Thomas E. Shook, Captain, Police Department, City of Richmond; John C. Karnes, Richmond Police Officer, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided June 30, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Glen Franklin Koontz, Office of the City Atty., Richmond, VA, for appellant Karnes; Robert A. Dybing, Shuford, Rubin & Gibney, Richmond, VA, for appellants Winston and Smith. Murray Joseph Janus, Bremner, Baber & Janus, Richmond, VA, for appellee. ON BRIEF: William Joe Hoppe, Office of the City Atty., Richmond, VA, for appellant Karnes; John A. Gibney, Jr., Shuford, Rubin & Gibney, Richmond, VA, for appellants Winston and Smith. Scott W. Lechner, Bremner, Baber & Janus, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation.


Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge K.K. HALL wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILLIAMS and Senior Judge GODBOLD joined.

OPINION

K.K. HALL, Circuit Judge:

In the early morning hours of May 10, 1992, the Richmond Police Department was conducting a sobriety checkpoint at a toll plaza on the Richmond Downtown Expressway. Drivers who failed a field sobriety test were taken into an office building adjoining the plaza and tested with a breathalyzer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases