1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 228 Conn.
  5. 228 Conn. 795 (1994)
 

STATE v. INDRISANO

(14631)

228 Conn. 795 (1994)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ALBERT INDRISANO

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released April 5, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward F. Hennessey, with whom were Linda L. Morkan and, on the brief, Louise Van Dyck, Sally S. King and Michael G. Zuk, for the appellant (defendant).

Rita M. Shair, assistant state's attorney, with whom were Eugene Callahan, state's attorney, and, on the brief, Warren Murray, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

PETERS, C. J., BORDEN, BERDON, KATZ and FOTI, Js.

BORDEN, J.

The dispositive issue of this appeal is whether certain portions of the disorderly conduct statute, namely, General Statutes § 53a-182 (a) (1) and (2),1 are unconstitutionally vague under the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution. The defendant, Albert Indrisano, was convicted, after a court trial, of disorderly conduct in violation of General Statutes §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases