In our view, Supreme Court correctly concluded that defendant is not obligated to provide underinsurance benefits to plaintiffs. Defendant disclaimed coverage under the underinsured motorist endorsement in its policy due to plaintiffs' delay in advising defendant of a potential personal injury claim and plaintiffs' failure to immediately forward to defendant a copy of the summons and complaint in that action. Under the circumstances, plaintiffs' clear failure to timely comply...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
