FECHTIG v. CITY OF ALBANY

LUBA Nos. 94-019; 94-020; CA A84992.

882 P.2d 138 (1994)

130 Or. App. 433

Allen D. FECHTIG, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. CITY OF ALBANY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 5, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Garry P. McMurry, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner—cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Garry P. McMurry & Assoc.

James V. Delapoer, Albany, argued the cause for respondent—cross-petitioner. With him on the brief was Long, Delapoer, Healy & McCann, P.C.

Before RIGGS, P.J., RICHARDSON, C.J., and De MUNIZ, J.


RIGGS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's decision affirming the City of Albany's allowance of a fill permit. The city cross-petitions, contending that LUBA erred by denying its motion to dismiss in case 94-019,1 made on the ground that petitioner's notice of intent to appeal to LUBA was untimely. Because the city's cross-petition raises a jurisdictional question, we address it first.

The city processed the application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases