The record reveals that the extension of placement of respondents' children with petitioner for a period of 12 months was a proper exercise of Family Court's discretion and in the best interests of the children. The court's decision and order make clear that it complied with the mandates of Family Court Act § 1055 (b) (iv) (A) and (B). The remaining contentions raised in this appeal have been considered and rejected for lack of merit.
Ordered that the order is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.