STATE v. CASEY

No. 20703.

876 P.2d 138 (1994)

125 Idaho 856

STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Claire CASEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls.

June 10, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Skinner, Fawcett & Mauk, Boise, for appellant. Chris Kronberg argued.

Larry EchoHawk, Idaho Atty. Gen., Douglas A. Werth, Deputy Atty. Gen., Boise, for respondent. Douglas A. Werth argued.


TROUT, Justice.

This case involves a constitutional challenge to I.C. § 36-1510(1)(c), which prohibits interference with hunting, fishing and predator control. We find that subsection to be unconstitutionally overbroad and hold that appellant's conviction thereunder cannot stand.

BACKGROUND

There is no dispute as to the facts surrounding appellant's arrest. On November 29, 1990, Claire Casey (Casey) had a run-in with two hunters on Bureau of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases