The sole reason the Board reopened claimant's case was to determine whether there had been any violations of the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment of Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [US Dist Ct, SD NY, Aug. 1, 1983]). Having found none, the Board adhered to its prior ruling that claimant's appeal to the Board was untimely. On this appeal, claimant neither contends that any procedural errors occurred or that the Board's finding of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.