There is substantial evidence to support the Board's conclusion that claimant was guilty of misconduct. Testimony indicated that he used insubordinate and vulgar language to his employer's assistant principal. Furthermore, the incident took place while claimant was helping out in the lunchroom in the presence of students. Claimant had also been warned in the past about insubordination. Claimant's arguments to the contrary raise questions of credibility which were for the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
