Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the decision of the Board that claimant, a per diem substitute teacher, did not have a reasonable assurance of employment for the 1991-1992 school year. The June 12, 1991 letter from claimant's employer made no promise of a job nor did it state that claimant was on any substitute list maintained either by the employer or the individual schools. Instead, claimant was given the burden of contacting the schools if he was interested...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
