PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's conviction and that part of his sentence which requires restitution.
However, as to the scoresheet used in his sentencing, appellant raises three questions, only one of which we conclude to have merit. Contrary to rule 3.701(d)(5)(G), the trial court erroneously scored a 1969 escape conviction which occurred while appellant was a juvenile and more than three years prior to the present offense. Because of this error we reverse...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
