SOUCEK v. BANHAM

No. C3-94-1203.

524 N.W.2d 478 (1994)

Jon SOUCEK, Appellant, v. Donald BANHAM, Jr., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied January 25, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald H. Nichols, Nichols, Kaster & Anderson, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Surell Brady, Minneapolis City Atty., Edward A. Backstrom, Asst. City Atty., Minneapolis, for respondents.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, P.J., and LANSING and HUSPENI, JJ.


OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

The issue in this case is the measure of damages a pet owner can recover when police officers shoot and kill a pet. The trial court determined that damages for the death of a pet are limited to replacement cost. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Jon Soucek owned a dog he called Mack. One night, Mack got loose from Soucek's back yard and was later spotted near downtown Minneapolis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases