1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 503 N.W.2d
  5. 503 N.W.2d 493 (1993)
 

McDONOUGH v. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT

Nos. CX-92-2442, CO-92-2448.

503 N.W.2d 493 (1993)

Michael McDONOUGH, Respondent, v. The CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, et al., Defendants (CX-92-2442), Appellants (CO-92-2448), E.B. McMenomy, only in his individual capacity, Appellant (CX-92-2442), Defendant (CO-92-2448).

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 10, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Albright, Bloomington, for Michael McDonough.

Kent G. Harbison, Mary E. Hanton, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, for City of Rosemount, et al.

Richard T. Ostlund, Ansis V. Viksnins, Lindquist & Vennum, Minneapolis, for E.B. McMenomy.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and PETERSON, JJ.

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Respondent Michael McDonough brought a lawsuit which arose out of his unsuccessful attempt to sell land to the City of Rosemount. The defendants are the City of Rosemount, E.B. McMenomy, individually, and Stephan Jilk, individually. The city, McMenomy and Jilk moved for summary judgment. The court limited recovery in the breach of contract claim to specific performance, granted summary judgment for the city on an issue not appealed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases