PRICE v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACC., INS. CO.

No. 92-55417.

2 F.3d 986 (1993)

Deno PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT, INSURANCE COMPANY, aka, The Provident; The Florsheim Shoe Company, aka The Florsheim Shoe Company-South, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided August 26, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bridget Baynes, Santa Ana, CA, for plaintiff-appellant.

Laura E. Fannon, Kelly, Herlihy & Bane, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees.

Before: BROWNING, FARRIS and KELLY, Circuit Judges.


FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

Deno Price filed suit to recover damages against Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company for its failure to pay medical expenses incurred by his decedent son under an insurance contract issued through his employer. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Provident, holding that the statute of limitations had run on Price's claim.

We reverse.

Deno Price was provided medical benefits by Provident through his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases