CLACKAMAS COUNTY v. FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS

UP-91-91; CA A75301.

862 P.2d 114 (1993)

124 Or. App. 395

CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Respondent, v. FEDERATION OF OREGON PAROLE AND PROBATION OFFICERS, Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daryl S. Garrettson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Aitchison, Hoag, Vick & Tarantino, Portland.

David W. Anderson, Asst. County Counsel, argued the cause and filed the brief, for respondent.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and DEITS and DURHAM, JJ.


DURHAM, Judge.

Petitioner, the exclusive bargaining representative for parole and probation officers employed by Clackamas County, seeks review of the Employment Relations Board's (ERB) order holding that the employees are not the equivalent of "police officers" within the meaning of ORS 243.736, that they are not prohibited from striking and, therefore, that petitioner committed an unfair labor practice "by insisting that the collective bargaining dispute between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases