STATE v. HARMAN

No. 92-1112.

67 Ohio St.3d 30 (1993)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE v. HARMAN, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 4, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Philomena, Mahoning County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kathi McNabb Welsh, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Stuart J. Banks, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

On appeal the parties have filed memoranda supporting and opposing jurisdiction. Since this is an appeal as of right under Section 2(B)(2)(a)(i), Article IV, Ohio Constitution, such memoranda are unnecessary. We treat them as briefs on the merits.

Reviewing the decision of the court of appeals on appeal from the conviction, we find that the judge writing the "majority" opinion voted to reverse for denial of the right to confront witnesses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases