Defendant's claim that the court coerced him into pleading guilty by threatening to sentence him without a presentence report in an unrelated case and convincing him incorrectly that a concurrent sentence in this case would not increase his prison time because he would be sentenced to the maximum in the unrelated case is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law since defendant never objected at sentencing, did not move to withdraw his plea under CPL 220.60 or move...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
