WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., CO. v. DOR

No. 88-2265.

176 Wis.2d 795 (1993)

500 N.W.2d 667

WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., CO., Petitioner-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant. Wisconsin DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. WILLIAM WRIGLEY, JR., CO., Respondent-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 9, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For William Wrigley, Jr., Co., there were briefs by Barbara J. Janaszek, John F. Emanuel and Whyte & Hirschboeck, S.C., Milwaukee and H. Randolph Williams and Baker & McKenzie, Chicago, IL.

For Wisconsin Department of Revenue the cause was submitted on the brief of F. Thomas Creeron, III, assistant attorney general and James E. Doyle, attorney general.


JON P. WILCOX, J.

This case is on remand from the United States Supreme Court.1 which reversed this court's decision2 that the Wisconsin Department of Revenue (DOR) could not impose a franchise tax on the petitioner, William Wrigley, Jr., Company. The issue before this court, which we did not address in our previous decision, is whether the assessed taxes are delinquent and subject to an 18 percent penalty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases