PALITZ v. MERCRUISER-MERCURY MARINE


194 A.D.2d 774 (1993)

599 N.Y.S.2d 1017

Mildren Palitz et al., Respondents, v. Mercruiser-Mercury Marine, a Division of Brunswick Corp., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. (And Another Title.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 28, 1993


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

It is well settled that the nature and degree of the penalty to be imposed for a refusal or failure to disclose is a matter lying within the sound discretion of the court (see, Sawh v Bridges, 120 A.D.2d 74; Berman v Szpilzinger, 180 A.D.2d 612). We perceive no improvident exercise of discretion in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases