DOOCHIN v. U.S. FIDELITY & GUAR. CO.


854 S.W.2d 109 (1993)

Julius DOOCHIN, Individually and d/b/a Julius Doochin Fabrication, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Appellant, and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Middle Section, at Nashville.

Application for Permission to Appeal Denied May 3, 1993.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael J. Vetter, Brewer, Krause & Brooks, Nashville, for defendant/counter-plaintiff/appellant.

James H. Porter, Warren M. Smith, Williams & Smith, Nashville, for plaintiff/appellee.


Application for Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court May 3, 1993.

OPINION

CANTRELL, Judge.

In this action, on a fire insurance policy, the jury allowed recovery and awarded the insured the 25% penalty pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 56-7-105. On appeal the insurer raises issues concerning the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, the admissibility of evidence, and the inflammatory remarks of opposing counsel in final...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases