1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 20 Cal.App.4th
  5. 20 Cal.App.4th 943 (1993)
 

EARL W. SCHOTT, INC. v. KALAR

Docket No. F017514.

20 Cal.App.4th 943 (1993)

24 Cal. Rptr.2d 580

EARL W. SCHOTT, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GARY KALAR, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

November 30, 1993.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Jory, Peterson & Sagaser, John E. Peterson and Barbara S. Huff for Defendant and Appellant.

Georgeson & Belardinelli, C. Russell Georgeson and David L. Rowell for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

BUCKLEY, J.

We are presented here with the issue of whether a complaining party is required to designate and serve a corporation in its corporate capacity in order to obtain an enforceable default judgment. We conclude such a requirement exists.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 18, 1991, Earl W. Schott, Inc. (Schott), filed a complaint for breach of contract, fraud and common counts against "GARY KALAR, individually...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases